This website is part of the ECDC (European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control) network
banner.GIFecdc.GIF

Feed-back form for evaluation of ESCAIDE 2009

1) What is your country of residence?

2) Where do you work?

3) Which describes best your current profession?

4) How did you first hear about the ESCAIDE?

 5) Were you an invited participant (travel and registration arranged by ECDC/EPIET)?

Conference Evaluation

Pre Conference Organisation

6) Please evaluate the following

Timing of information received before the conference

Accuracy of information received before the conference

Timing of Call for Abstracts

Timing of final program published

Conference registration procedure

Abstract submission procedure

Guidelines for presenters and moderators

7) Your comments on the pre-conference organisation:

Overall Conference organisation

8) Please evaluate the following

Overall quality of the ESCAIDE?

Overall relevance of topics to your work?

Overall transparency and fairness in the planning and implementation of ESCAIDE 2009?

ESCAIDE 2009 as a learning experience?

ESCADIE 2009 as a mechanism to change your current practises?

9) Your comments on the overall quality of the ESCAIDE

10) Which plenary session did you enjoy most? (please tick only one)

11) Why did you enjoy this plenary session most?

12) Which parallel session did you enjoy most? (please tick maximum of three)

13) Why did you enjoy this/these parallel sessions most?

Conference scheduling

14) Please evaluate the following aspects of conference scheduling

Start and finish time of the daily sessions

Having parallel sessions

Ease of choice between parallel sessions

Balance between plenary and parallel sessions

Opportunities for informal contact with other participants

Time allocated to poster sessions

15) Your comments on the conference scheduling

16) Please evaluate the following aspects of the Plenary sessions:

Number of presentations in each plenary session

The time allocated for panel discussions in the plenary sessions

17) Would you prefer more 'review' style plenary presentations

18) Please suggest topics for plenary sessions at ESCAIDE 2010:

19) Please evaluate the following aspects of the parallel sessions:

Amount of time allocated to each presentation (10 minutes each)

The time allocated for question & answers in the plenary sessions

20) Please give any comments on the parallel sessions

21) Please evaluate the following aspects of the poster sessions:

Clarity of poster session topics

Poster room layout

Lack of moderation in the poster sessions

22) Please give any comments on the poster sessions

Conference materials

23) Please evaluate the following conference material:

Quality of ESCAIDE abstract book

Quality of the ESCAIDE programme

Quality of the additional conference material (bags, USB’s, pens etc)

24) Please give any comments on the conference material

General conference arrangements

25) Please evaluate the following:

General conference arrangements

Suitability of the location (Stockholm)

Suitability of venue (Munchen Bryggeriet)

Overall suitability of conference rooms & facilities

Standard of lunches provided

Standard of coffee breaks provided

On-site help with enquiries regarding the conference / local information

Quality of the EPIET/ESCAIDE After Party (Parken III)

26) Please give any comments on the general conference arrangements

27) Do you intend to attend the ESCAIDE next year?

28) Additional comments/suggestions/constructive criticism:

© European Center for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) 2005-2008